{"id":"DUT-ME-013","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"United States District Court for the District of Maine","state":"ME","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"Hon. Nancy Torresen, U.S. District Judge","authority":"28 U.S.C. sec. 1331; 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983; Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)","instrument":"Order on Plaintiff\u0027s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills, No. 1:20-cv-00156-NT, ECF No. 27 (D. Me. May 9, 2020), reported at 459 F. Supp. 3d 273","title":"Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills: order refusing a temporary restraining order against the ten-person gathering limit as applied to worship","dateIssued":"2020-05-09","effective":"2020-05-09","end":"n/a (affirmed, 52 F.4th 40 (1st Cir. 2022), post-period)","startDate":"2020-05-09","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["GATH","EVT","CLOSE","STAY"],"addressees":["persons generally; all businesses (EO 19); religious gatherings"],"clause":"Executive Order 19 may be enforced through Maine departments or officials that issue business licenses. Executive Order 19 at 4.... Executive Order 28 states that violations constitute a class E crime.","enforcement":"as recited: Class E crime (EO 28); enforcement through business licenses (EO 19); summonses and arrests by the Maine State Police for egregious violators","functions":[],"notes":"The court recited the enforcement scheme of EO 14, EO 19 and EO 28 (Exs. ME-004, ME-007, ME-011), including that non-essential businesses\u0027 operations were to be \u0027facilitated to the maximum extent practicable by employees working remotely,\u0027 that EO 19 was enforceable through business licenses, that EO 28 violations were Class E crimes, and that the Maine State Police announced on April 2, 2020 that they would enforce the orders, \u0027asking for voluntary compliance\u0027 but, as \u0027a last course of action and reserved for only the most egregious violators,\u0027 \u0027[i]ssu[ing] summonses or mak[ing] physical arrests\u0027 (at 6 n.7); it applied Jacobson v. Massachusetts and refused the restraining order. Character as recorded: adjudication (order_penalty layer).","sourceUrl":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-med-1_20-cv-00156/pdf/USCOURTS-med-1_20-cv-00156-0.pdf","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":310953,"grade":"primary","character":"adjudication","description":"","collection":"DUT-ME","url":"/library/DUT-ME-013","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-ME-013","citation":"Hon. Nancy Torresen, U.S. District Judge, Order on Plaintiff\u0027s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills, No. 1:20-cv-00156-NT, ECF No. 27 (D. Me. May 9, 2020), reported at 459 F. Supp. 3d 273 (Ex. DUT-ME-013)","stateName":"Maine","related":["ME-004","ME-007","ME-011"]}