{"id":"LAW-065","kind":"law","level":"law","jurisdiction":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit","authority":"Hoctor v. United States Department of Agriculture, 82 F.3d 165 (7th Cir. 1996) (CAP text)","instrument":"Hoctor v. United States Department of Agriculture, 82 F.3d 165 (7th Cir. 1996) (CAP text)","title":"Hoctor v. United States Department of Agriculture, 82 F.3d 165 (7th Cir. 1996) (CAP text)","dateIssued":"1996-04-25","effective":"","end":"","startDate":"1996-04-25","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":[],"addressees":[],"clause":"Every governmental agency that enforces a less than crystalline statute must interpret the statute, and it does the public a favor if it announces the interpretation in advance of enforcement... (at 167)... We are not saying that an interpretive rule can never have a numerical component.... There is merely an empirical relation between interpretation and generality on the one hand, and legislation and specificity on the other.... Even in a nontechnical area the use of a number as a rule of thumb to guide the application of a general norm will often be legitimately interpretive. (at 170-71)","enforcement":"","functions":[],"notes":"Decided April 25, 1996 (argued Feb. 9, 1996).","sourceUrl":"https://static.case.law/f3d/82/html/0165-01.html","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":145732,"grade":"primary","character":"case","description":"","collection":"LEG-A","url":"/library/LAW-065","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/LAW-065","citation":"United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Hoctor v. United States Department of Agriculture, 82 F.3d 165 (7th Cir. 1996) (CAP text) (Apr. 25, 1996) (Ex. LAW-065)","stateName":"","related":[]}