{"id":"LAW-471","kind":"law","level":"law","jurisdiction":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"Supreme Court of the United States (Holmes, J.)","authority":"Atchison, Topeka \u0026 Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O\u0027Connor, 223 U.S. 280 (1912)","instrument":"Atchison, Topeka \u0026 Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O\u0027Connor, 223 U.S. 280 (1912)","title":"Atchison, Topeka \u0026 Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O\u0027Connor, 223 U.S. 280 (1912)","dateIssued":"1912-02-19","effective":"","end":"","startDate":"1912-02-19","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":[],"addressees":[],"clause":"","enforcement":"","functions":[],"notes":"\u0027when, as is common, the State has a more summary remedy, such as distress, and the party indicates by protest that he is yielding to what he cannot prevent, courts sometimes perhaps have been a little too slow to recognize the implied duress under which payment is made\u0027 (at 285-86); a party facing forfeiture of its right to do business \u0027is entitled to assert his supposed right on reasonably equal terms\u0027 (at 286).","sourceUrl":"https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep223/usrep223280/usrep223280.pdf","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":274790,"grade":"primary","character":"case","description":"","collection":"LEG-D","url":"/library/LAW-471","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/LAW-471","citation":"Supreme Court of the United States (Holmes, J.), Atchison, Topeka \u0026 Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O\u0027Connor, 223 U.S. 280 (1912) (Feb. 19, 1912) (Ex. LAW-471)","stateName":"","related":[]}