{"id":"LAW-484","kind":"law","level":"law","jurisdiction":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","authority":"Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen\u0027s Union of the Pacific, 777 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1985)","instrument":"Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen\u0027s Union of the Pacific, 777 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1985)","title":"Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen\u0027s Union of the Pacific, 777 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1985)","dateIssued":"1985-12-09","effective":"","end":"","startDate":"1985-12-09","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":[],"addressees":[],"clause":"","enforcement":"","functions":[],"notes":"Footnote 3 at 1398: a union officer\u0027s \u0027opinion as to the correct construction of the collective bargaining agreement... is an inadmissible legal conclusion. See Fed.R.Evid. 701...; Fed.R.Evid. 704 advisory committee notes (Rule 701 \u0022affords ample [assurance] against the admission of opinions which would merely tell the jury what result to reach.... [The Rule] also stand[s] ready to exclude opinions phrased in terms of inadequately explored legal criteria.\u0022)\u0027.","sourceUrl":"https://static.case.law/f2d/777/html/1390-01.html","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":241241,"grade":"primary","character":"case","description":"","collection":"LEG-D","url":"/library/LAW-484","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/LAW-484","citation":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Evangelista v. Inlandboatmen\u0027s Union of the Pacific, 777 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir. 1985) (Dec. 9, 1985) (Ex. LAW-484)","stateName":"","related":[]}