{"id":"MET-PHX-007","kind":"order","level":"county","jurisdiction":"Pima County, Arizona (with State of Arizona, Attorney General)","state":"AZ","metro":"PHX","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"Pima County Board of Supervisors (Resolutions 2020-49 and 2020-96), as recited in Arizona Attorney General informal Opinion No. I21-003 (Apr. 6, 2021)","authority":"A.R.S. 36-183.02 and Title 36, ch. 1, art. 4 (Pima County); A.R.S. 26-307 and EO 2020-40 (State authorization); A.R.S. 41-193(A)(7) (opinion)","instrument":"Pima County Resolution No. 2020-49 (June 19, 2020) and Resolution No. 2020-96 (Dec. 4, 2020) (face coverings); Attorney General Opinion No. I21-003 on Executive Order 2021-06","title":"Executive Order 2021-06 and Pima County Resolution No. 2020-96","dateIssued":"2020-06-19","effective":"2020-06-19 (Resolution 2020-49); 2020-12-04 (Resolution 2020-96, updating the mandate)","end":"Pima County bulletin of Mar. 30, 2021: Resolution 2020-96 \u0027is still in effect\u0027 notwithstanding EO 2021-06; repeal date not verified","startDate":"2020-06-19","endDate":"2021-03-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2"],"types":["MASK","EMP"],"addressees":["all persons five years and older in Pima County, including incorporated areas","businesses"],"clause":"On June 19, 2020, Pima County adopted Resolution 2020-49, requiring, among other things, that when a person not exempted by the resolution \u0027is in a public place and cannot easily maintain a continuous distance of at least six feet from all other persons[,]\u0027 the person \u0027must wear a face covering.\u0027 This order was incorporated into Resolution 2020-96, adopted on December 4, 2020, which updated the previously adopted face-covering mandate.... [EO 2021-06:] Pursuant to A.R.S. 26-307, no county, city or town may make or issue any order, rule or regulation that conflicts with or is in addition to the policy, directives or intent of this or any other Executive Order... This includes but is not limited to mandated use of face coverings. Any city, town or county that has a rule, regulation or ordinance not in place as of March 11, 2020 that is in conflict with the provisions of this order shall not be enforced. Political [subdivisions] maintain the right to set and enforce mitigation policies in their own government buildings and on public transportation, including, but not limited to, requiring face coverings.... this informal opinion concludes that it is unlikely Pima County Resolution 2020-96 is unenforceable due to conflict with Executive Order 2021-06.","enforcement":"Resolution 2020-49 precluded any penalty, including any civil penalty (Tucson Ordinance 11766 recital); Tucson supplied the civil penalty within the City","functions":["SF public places and businesses in Pima County (patron masks)","CB","WF"],"notes":"Husch Blackwell (Ex. MET-PHX-036): Resolution passed June 19, 2020, ages five and older, exempting restaurant patrons and outdoor exercisers, no expiration date. Footnote 1 of the opinion records the pending curfew litigation, Next Level Arcade Tucson, LLC v. Pima County, 2 CA-CV 2021-0034 (Ariz. Ct. App.). the opinion is read in full (verified_primary as a State instrument).","sourceUrl":"https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2021-04/I21-003.pdf","snapshot":"https://web.archive.org/web/20210511161020/https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2021-04/I21-003.pdf","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":167464,"grade":"primary","character":"","description":"","collection":"MET-PHX","url":"/library/MET-PHX-007","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/MET-PHX-007","citation":"Pima County Board of Supervisors (Resolutions 2020-49 and 2020-96), as recited in Arizona Attorney General informal Opinion No. I21-003 (Apr. 6, 2021), Pima County Resolution No. 2020-49 (June 19, 2020) and Resolution No. 2020-96 (Dec. 4, 2020) (face coverings); Attorney General Opinion No. I21-003 on Executive Order 2021-06 (Ex. MET-PHX-007)","stateName":"Arizona","related":["MET-PHX-036","MET-PHX-034","MET-PHX-043"]}