{"total":3,"page":1,"pageSize":25,"pages":1,"millis":0,"query":{"q":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","kind":"","level":"court","type":"","quarter":"","grade":"","collection":"DUT-CA","from":"","to":"","sort":"relevance"},"items":[{"id":"DUT-CA-018","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"California","state":"CA","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-CA","issuer":"California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District (Robie, J., with Hull and Mauro, JJ.)","instrument":"Published opinion: Newsom v. Superior Court (Gallagher), No. C093006 (Cal. Ct. App. May 5, 2021), 63 Cal.App.5th 1099","title":"Newsom v. Superior Court of Sutter County (Gallagher, real parties in interest): the Emergency Services Act authorizes the Governor to issue quasi-legislative orders during a state of emergency; such orders have \u0027the force and effect of law\u0027; section 8627 is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power","dateIssued":"2021-05-05","startDate":"2021-05-05","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","EMER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-CA-018","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-CA-018"},{"id":"DUT-CA-019","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"California","state":"CA","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-CA","issuer":"California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District","instrument":"Published opinion: See\u0027s Candies, Inc. v. Superior Court (Ek), No. B312241 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2021), 73 Cal.App.5th 66","title":"See\u0027s Candies, Inc. v. Superior Court: a wrongful-death action alleging that an employee contracted COVID-19 at work \u0027because of defendants\u0027 failure to implement adequate safety measures\u0027 and infected her husband is not barred by workers\u0027 compensation exclusivity; the derivative-injury doctrine does not reach the household member\u0027s claim","dateIssued":"2021-12-21","startDate":"2021-12-21","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":["DUTY","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-CA-019","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-CA-019"},{"id":"DUT-CA-020","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"California","state":"CA","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-CA","issuer":"Supreme Court of California (Corrigan, J., for a unanimous court)","instrument":"Opinion: Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc., No. S274191 (Cal. July 6, 2023), 14 Cal.5th 993","title":"Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks: employers \u0027allowed to continue operations during this time were subject to strict regulations designed to limit transmission of the virus\u0027; the county health order \u0027mandated specific health and safety precautions\u0027; the employer remains under \u0027the default duty to use due care in its operations\u0027; no tort duty runs to employees\u0027 household members","dateIssued":"2023-07-06","startDate":"2023-07-06","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":["DUTY","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-CA-020","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-CA-020"}],"facets":{"kind":[{"value":"duty","label":"Standing duty","count":3}],"level":[{"value":"court","label":"Court","count":3}],"state":[{"value":"CA","label":"California","count":3}],"type":[{"value":"DUTY","label":"Standing duty","count":3},{"value":"EMP","label":"Workplace rules","count":2},{"value":"EMER","label":"Emergency declaration","count":1}],"quarter":[{"value":"2021Q2","label":"2021 Q2","count":1},{"value":"2021Q3","label":"2021 Q3","count":1}],"grade":[{"value":"primary","label":"Primary source read","count":3}],"industry":[],"agency":[]}}