Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Standing duties: Delaware
  3. DUT-DE-012

Ex. DUT-DE-012 Standing duty Primary source read

Opinion, In re COVID-Related Restrictions on Religious Services, No. 354, 2023 (Del. Aug. 1, 2024) (affirming the Court of Chancery, C.A. No. 2021-1036, and the Superior Court, C.A. No. N23C-01-123)

In re COVID-Related Restrictions on Religious Services (Del. Aug. 1, 2024)

Supreme Court of Delaware (Seitz, C.J.; Valihura, Traynor, LeGrow and Griffiths, JJ., en banc) · Delaware (Court)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
Delaware
Level
Court
Authority
20 Del. C. §§ 3115(a)-(c), 3116(b)(13); 10 Del. C. § 4001 (State Tort Claims Act)
Issued
2024-08-01 Aug. 1, 2024
Effective
2024-08-01
End
standing (final judgment)
In force
Standing since Aug. 1, 2024 (a statutory duty; in force throughout the six quarters)
Limitation types
Business closureGathering capStanding duty
Addressees
  • persons generally; Essential and Non-Essential Businesses; houses of worship
Character
adjudication
Collection
Standing duties: Delaware DUT-DE

Operative words

The Fourth Modification stated that it had "the force and effect of law," and that "[a]ny failure to comply with [its] provisions... constitutes a criminal offense."

Penalty

criminal offense under 20 Del. C. § 3125 (as recited in the orders and in the opinion)

What it required

The Delaware Supreme Court recites that the Emergency Management Act empowers the Governor to issue emergency orders 'which shall have the force and effect of law' (slip op. at 3, quoting § 3115(b)), that the Fourth Modification required Non-Essential Businesses to close their physical locations and bound Essential Businesses to 'a list of mandates and restrictions, titled "Responsibilities of Essential Businesses"' (at 4-5), that non-compliance 'constitutes a criminal offense' (at 5), and that the Governor's adoption of the restrictions was an exercise of discretionary statutory authority (at 36-37). Character as recorded: adjudication (orders upheld).

Retrieval note

Cite the opinion for its description of the orders' legal force and of the business mandates. The court's holdings concern mootness, standing and the Governor's immunity under 10 Del. C. § 4001; the passage on 'a probable constitutional violation' concerns the singling out of houses of worship and is not relied on. Slip-opinion pagination from the PDF.