Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Standing duties: Federal layer
  3. DUT-FED-002

Ex. DUT-FED-002 Standing duty Primary source read

29 U.S.C. 660(c) (OSH Act § 11(c), anti-retaliation)

Judicial review; discharge or discrimination against employee for exercise of rights

Congress (OSH Act § 11(c)) · United States (Federal)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
United States
Level
Federal
Authority
29 U.S.C. 660(c)(1)-(2)
Issued
1970-12-29 Dec. 29, 1970
Effective
standing (read as 1970-12-29)
End
standing (read as 2021-09-30)
In force
Standing since Dec. 29, 1970 (a statutory duty; in force throughout the six quarters)
Quarters
2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3
Limitation types
Workplace rulesStanding duty
Addressees
  • any person, including every employer
Character
statutory duty
Collection
Standing duties: Federal layer DUT-FED

Operative words

No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this chapter or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or others of any right afforded by this chapter.

Penalty

29 U.S.C. 660(c)(2): Secretary's suit in district court for reinstatement with back pay and 'all appropriate relief'

What it required

Employers could not discipline, discharge or reduce the hours or pay of an employee who complained of COVID-19 hazards to OSHA or the employer, or who refused in good faith to face an imminent danger (29 C.F.R. 1977.12(b)(2), Ex. DUT-FED-008). OSHA's April 8, 2020 release restated the rule for the pandemic (Ex. DUT-FED-066), and the April 13, 2020 enforcement plan directs inspectors to inform workers of the protection (Ex. AGY-FED-LABOR-IMMIGRATION-020).