Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Standing duties: Illinois
  3. DUT-IL-011

Ex. DUT-IL-011 Standing duty Primary source read

JL Properties Group B, LLC v. Pritzker, 2021 IL App (3d) 200305

Affirmance of the circuit court's refusal of a preliminary injunction against the Governor's residential eviction moratoria; the special concurrence would hold the moratoria authorized by section 7(8) of the IEMA Act as control of 'the movement of persons' and 'the occupancy of premises'

Illinois Appellate Court, Third District (majority; Presiding Justice McDade specially concurring) · Illinois (Appellate Court, Third District) (Court)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
Illinois (Appellate Court, Third District) · Illinois
Level
Court
Authority
Ill. S. Ct. R. 304(a), 307(a); 20 ILCS 3305/7
Issued
2021-05-21 May 21, 2021
Effective
2021-05-21 (opinion filed) (read as 2021-05-21)
End
n/a (final) (read as 2021-09-30)
In force
May 21, 2021 to Sept. 30, 2021
Quarters
2021 Q22021 Q3
Limitation types
Emergency declarationOther
Addressees
  • landlords and property owners (the moratoria); by the concurrence's reasoning, every premises whose occupancy the Governor regulated under section 7(8)
Character
adjudication
Collection
Standing duties: Illinois DUT-IL

Operative words

Those powers include '[t]o control ingress and egress to and from a disaster area, the movement of persons within the area, and the occupancy of premises therein.' 20 ILCS 3305/7(8) (West 2018). We find that this broad grant of authority to the Governor reasonably encompasses his ability to impose the moratoria.

Penalty

n/a (judicial decision)

What it required

The majority held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the dismissal of counts I, II, III and VI (¶ 53) and that the circuit court did not err when it refused a preliminary injunction against the eviction moratoria, affirming 'solely on the basis of the equities' (¶¶ 64, 66); the special concurrence would have decided the merits and would hold that section 7(8) authorized the moratoria and that they did not violate separation of powers (¶¶ 99-102). Character as recorded: adjudication (orders upheld).

Retrieval note

The quotation is from the special concurrence, which is the only opinion in the case that reaches the scope of section 7(8); the majority's holding is jurisdictional and equitable. Cite accordingly: the decision confirms that the moratoria (IL-012, IL-070, IL-067) remained in force through the second and third quarters of 2021 with judicial sanction, and the concurrence supplies the reading of section 7(8) as a power over 'the occupancy of premises.'.