Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Legal authorities
  3. LAW-010

Ex. LAW-010 Legal authority Primary source read

Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992)

Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992)

Supreme Court of the United States (Legal authority)

The COVID Project

The record

Level
Legal authority
Authority
Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992)
Issued
1992-03-09 Mar. 9, 1992
In force
Mar. 9, 1992 (no end date recorded; counted as in force for 120 days)
Character
case

Operative words

We have stated time and again that courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there.... When the words of a statute are unambiguous, then, this first canon is also the last: "judicial inquiry is complete." (Germain, 503 U.S. at 253-54). "When we find the terms of a statute unambiguous, judicial inquiry is complete, except 'in rare and exceptional circumstances.'" (Rubin, 449 U.S. at 430)

Notes

Tri-State applies Germain at 16 (refusing to 'adopt additional requirements not provided for in the statute') and at 17-18 (the meaning of 'due to' is plain; 'judicial inquiry is complete').