Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Legal authorities
  3. LAW-078

Ex. LAW-078 Legal authority Primary source read

Lemus-Escobar v. Bondi, No. 18-73423 (9th Cir. June 16, 2025) (opinion), 140 F.4th 1079

Lemus-Escobar v. Bondi, No. 18-73423 (9th Cir. June 16, 2025) (opinion), 140 F.4th 1079

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Legal authority)

The COVID Project

The record

Level
Legal authority
Authority
Lemus-Escobar v. Bondi, No. 18-73423 (9th Cir. June 16, 2025) (opinion), 140 F.4th 1079
Issued
2025-06-16 June 16, 2025
In force
June 16, 2025 (no end date recorded; counted as in force for 120 days)
Character
case

Operative words

The weight of such a judgment in a particular case will depend upon the thoroughness evident in its consideration, the validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors which give it power to persuade, if lacking power to control. (Skidmore at 140)... We therefore apply Skidmore deference here. The weight given to an agency's interpretation under Skidmore depends on the thoroughness, consistency, and persuasiveness of the decision itself. (Lemus-Escobar, amended slip op. at 28)

Notes

Superseded by the amended opinion (LAW-079).