| Ex. DUT-OR-015 | Oregon OSHA, Questions and Answers Regarding the Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division's (Oregon OSHA) Education and Enforcement of Issues Related to COVID-19 (updated Mar. 27, 2020): the agency's statement of the employer's statutory duty and of its authority to enforce the Governor's executive orders at the workplaceQuestions and Answers Regarding the Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division's (Oregon OSHA) Education and Enforcement of Issues… | Oregon OSHA, Department of Consumer and Business Services | OregonState | Mar. 27, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureTelework mandateWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-011 | Oregon OSHA COVID-19 Workplace Advisory Memo (6.27b): Business/Employer Enforcement of the Oregon Health Authority 'Statewide Mask, Face Shield, Face Covering Guidance' (issued June 27, 2020; revised June 30, 2020)Business/Employer Enforcement of the Oregon Health Authority 'Statewide Mask, Face Shield, Face Covering Guidance' | Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division (Oregon OSHA), Department of Consumer and Business Services | OregonState | June 27, 2020 | 2020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-012 | Oregon OSHA, Temporary Rule Addressing the COVID-19 Workplace Risks: Questions and Answers (originally issued Nov. 23, 2020; version of Nov. 23, 2020)Temporary Rule Addressing The COVID-19 Workplace Risks: Questions and Answers | Oregon OSHA, Department of Consumer and Business Services | OregonState | Nov. 23, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-014 | Oregon OSHA, List of Oregon OSHA Citations Identified as Related to COVID-19 (June 2, 2021): the agency's account of its COVID-19 enforcement (complaints, inspections, citations and penalties) with the willful and serious citations listed by county and employerList of Oregon OSHA Citations Identified as Related to COVID-19 | Oregon OSHA, Department of Consumer and Business Services | OregonState | June 2, 2021 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-013 | Oregon OSHA Workplace Advisory Memo 8.13.21: Employer Enforcement of Facial Covering Requirements in Relation to Customers, Clients, and Other Guests (Aug. 13, 2021)Employer Enforcement of Facial Covering Requirements in Relation to Customers, Clients, and Other Guests | Oregon OSHA, Department of Consumer and Business Services | OregonState | Aug. 13, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-017 | JGB Enterprises, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 325 Or App 326, 529 P3d 262 (Apr. 19, 2023) (A176066): judicial review affirming a default order suspending a Lane County saloon's liquor license for 38 days for violating EO 20-66 and OHA guidance 'that qualified as public health laws' during Extreme Risk (Jan. 4-Feb. 20, 2021)JGB Enterprises, LLC, dba Twisted River Saloon, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Respondent | Oregon Court of Appeals | OregonCourt | Apr. 19, 2023 | 2021 Q1 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitFace-covering requirementOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-016 | Along Came Trudy LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 330 Or App 295, 543 P3d 751 (Jan. 24, 2024), rev den, 372 Or 588 (July 18, 2024) (A178679; OLCC21V003): judicial review affirming cancellation of a Lane County restaurant and event venue's liquor license for three violations of EO 20-66 (indoor dining while prohibited)Along Came Trudy LLC, dba Along Came Trudy, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Respondent | Oregon Court of Appeals (Kamins, J., with Tookey, P.J., and Egan, J.); review denied by the Oregon Supreme Court | OregonCourt | Jan. 24, 2024 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitFace-covering requirementOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-018 | Central Pastime, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 342 Or App 391 (Aug. 6, 2025) (A180094; OLCCV024): judicial review affirming a 72-day liquor-license suspension for failing to require employees and customers to wear face coverings on Dec. 2, 2020 (OHA July 24, 2020 guidance) and Mar. 27, 2021 (EO 20-66)In the Matter of the Full-On Premises Sales License Held By Central Pastime, LLC, dba Central Pastime, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and… | Oregon Court of Appeals (Shorr, P.J., with Pagan, J., and O'Connor, J.) | OregonCourt | Aug. 6, 2025 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOther | Primary source read | |