Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Federal commerce, travel, workplace and finance layer
  3. FED-295

Ex. FED-295 Order Primary source read

Judicial Conference finding under CARES Act § 15002 that emergency conditions due to the COVID-19 national emergency will materially affect the functioning of the federal courts generally

Judiciary Authorizes Video/Audio Access During COVID-19 Pandemic (uscourts.gov, Mar. 31, 2020)

Judicial Conference of the United States (finding of Mar. 29, 2020), announced by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Mar. 31, 2020 · United States federal courts (all districts) (Court)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
United States federal courts (all districts)
Level
Court
Authority
CARES Act § 15002(b)(1), Pub. L. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281, 528 (Mar. 27, 2020)
Issued
2020-03-29 Mar. 29, 2020
Effective
2020-03-29 through the 'covered emergency period' (30 days after termination of the national emergency; CARES Act § 15002(a)) (read as 2020-03-29)
End
2023-05-10 (30 days after Pub. L. 118-3 terminated the national emergency; post-period) (read as 2023-05-10)
In force
Mar. 29, 2020 to May 10, 2023
Quarters
2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3
Limitation types
Courts and public offices
Addressees
  • chief judges of the 94 district courts
  • criminal defendants and counsel
Functions reached
  • CT every federal district authorized video and telephone criminal proceedings.
Collection
Federal commerce, travel, workplace and finance layer FED-B

Operative words

emergency conditions due to the national emergency declared by the President with respect to COVID-19 will materially affect the functioning of the federal courts generally [the Judicial Conference finding quoted in the announcement]; CARES Act § 15002(b)(1): 'if the Judicial Conference of the United States finds that emergency conditions due to the national emergency declared by the President under the National Emergencies Act... will materially affect the functioning of either the Federal courts generally or a particular district court of the United States, the chief judge of a district court covered by the finding... may authorize the use of video teleconferencing, or telephone conferencing if video teleconferencing is not reasonably available, for the following events: (A) Detention hearings... (B) Initial appearances...'

Enforcement

statutory authorization; district-court standing orders (e.g., Exs. FED-301, FED-334, FED-364)

Notes

The national predicate for the district courts' CARES Act orders; the finding was renewed every 90 days through 2023.

Retrieval note

Announcement read on uscourts.gov; the statutory text quoted from Ex. FED-340.