| Ex. DUT-OR-019 | Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and 'may' be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review | Supreme Court of Oregon | OregonCourt | Feb. 12, 1985 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OH-017 | Court decisionEicher v. United States Steel Corp., 32 Ohio St.3d 248 (1987) (decided September 2, 1987) | Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793) | OhioCourt | Sept. 2, 1987 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-SC-020 | Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se… | Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina) | South CarolinaCourt | Oct. 14, 1991 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-013 | Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Travis, 808 So. 2d 928 (Miss. 2002), No. 2000-IA-01074-SCT (Feb. 28, 2002)Employer's 'non-delegable duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work' (claims of ninety-nine employees arising from the employer's… | Supreme Court of Mississippi (Smith, P.J., for the Court) | MississippiCourt | Feb. 28, 2002 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-014 | Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Armond, 866 So. 2d 1092 (Miss. 2004), No. 2003-IA-00398-SCT (Feb. 19, 2004)The Supreme Court's statement of its Travis holding: all the employees' claims 'arose out of ICR's policy of not warning or protecting its… | Supreme Court of Mississippi | MississippiCourt | Feb. 19, 2004 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MO-010 | Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., 489 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. banc 2016), No. SC94442, opinion issued June 7, 2016Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick Terrio | Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc (Breckenridge, C.J.; Stith, Draper and Russell, JJ., concurring; Fischer, J., concurring in result; Wilson and Teitelman, JJ., in separate opinions) | MissouriCourt | June 7, 2016 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. SD-059 | Fourth Judicial Circuit Administrative Order #2 Re: COVID-19 Pandemic ResponseAdministrative Order #2 Re: COVID-19 Pandemic Response | Presiding Judge Michael W. Day | Fourth Judicial CircuitCourt | Mar. 23, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Travel and quarantineCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CIN-003 | Joint Administrative Order re Courthouse Access Screening Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19In re: Courthouse Access Screening Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 | Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, and Hamilton County Municipal Court (Judges Kubicki and Russell) | Hamilton County, OhioCourt | Apr. 6, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-TX-021 | In re Abbott, No. 20-50264 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2020) (published), 954 F.3d 772In re Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, et al. (petition for writ of mandamus; GA-09) | United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Duncan, J., joined by Elrod, J.; Dennis, J., dissenting) | Texas (United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit)Court | Apr. 7, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationHealth care ordersStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-KS-020 | Kelly v. Legislative Coordinating Council, No. 122,765 (Kan. Apr. 11, 2020) (original action in quo warranto; quo warranto granted in part)Laura Kelly, Governor of the State of Kansas, v. Legislative Coordinating Council, et al. | Supreme Court of Kansas (per curiam) | KansasCourt | Apr. 11, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyGathering capEvents and venuesStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DCM-041 | Order, In re Public Notice of COVID-19 Related Courthouse-Entry Screening, CM 2020-48700Order directing courthouse-entry screening and posting of notice (effective April 27, 2020) | Circuit Court of Fairfax County | Fairfax County, VirginiaCourt | Apr. 24, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-ME-011 | Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills, No. 2:20-cv-00176-LEW, ECF No. 20 (D. Me. May 29, 2020), reported at 463 F. Supp. 3d 22Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills: order refusing preliminary injunction against the 14-day self-quarantine requirement of Executive Order… | Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge | United States District Court for the District of MaineCourt | May 29, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyTravel and quarantineQuarantine and isolationOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-LAS-014 | Administrative Order 20-17 (All Court Operations in Response to COVID-19)Administrative Order 20-17 | Chief Judge Linda Marie Bell and Chief Justice Kristina Pickering (joint order) | Clark County, Nevada (Eighth Judicial District)Court | June 1, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1 | Gathering capFace-covering requirementTravel and quarantineCourts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. IL-065 | M.R. 30370, In re: Illinois Courts Response to COVID-19 Emergency (order of August 27, 2020, replacing subpart F of the March 17, 2020 order)Courthouse entry conditions: no entry without a mask or face covering; exclusion of symptomatic persons and persons under quarantine or… | Supreme Court of Illinois | IllinoisCourt | Aug. 27, 2020 | 2020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-MSY-069 | Order 2020-013 (COVID-19 Phase III)24th JDC Phase III from September 14, 2020: masks required; six-foot distancing; jury trials may recommence; galleries limited to 14… | Chief Judge Ellen Shirer Kovach | 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of JeffersonCourt | Sept. 14, 2020 | 2020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Capacity limitFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CIN-005 | Joint Amended Administrative Order, No. M200001 (entered Sept. 25, 2020)In re: Courthouse Operations and Access Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 | Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, and Hamilton County Municipal Court | Hamilton County, OhioCourt | Sept. 25, 2020 | 2020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Gathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. SD-049 | Standing Order Regarding COVID-19 Courthouse Security Measures, CIV. 20-4 (October 20, 2020)Standing Order Regarding COVID-19 Courthouse Security Measures | Presiding Judge Robin J. Houwman | Second Judicial Circuit (Minnehaha and Lincoln Counties)Court | Oct. 20, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Capacity limitFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-009 | Administrative Order of the Chief Justice, In re Novel Coronavirus and COVID-19 Disease (filed Nov. 3, 2020)Statewide administrative order requiring every court holding in-person proceedings to adopt a written transmission-control plan (telephonic… | Chief Justice Michael G. Heavican, Nebraska Supreme Court | Nebraska Supreme Court (Chief Justice; statewide)Court | Nov. 3, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-NM-012 | Grisham v. Reeb, 2021-NMSC-006, 480 P.3d 852, No. S-1-SC-38336 (N.M. Nov. 5, 2020)Opinion holding that the Legislature empowered the Governor and Secretary of Health to enforce public health emergency orders restricting… | Supreme Court of New Mexico (Vigil, J., for a unanimous Court) | New MexicoCourt | Nov. 5, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureGathering capStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. TN-046 | In re: COVID-19 Pandemic, No. ADM2020-00428, Order Extending State of Emergency and Suspending Jury TrialsOrder Extending State of Emergency and Suspending Jury Trials | Tennessee Supreme Court | TennesseeCourt | Nov. 17, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Gathering capCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MA-020 | Desrosiers v. Governor, 486 Mass. 369, SJC-12983 (argued Sept. 11, 2020; decided Dec. 10, 2020)Decision holding that the Civil Defense Act authorized the Governor's March 10, 2020 declaration and the COVID-19 emergency orders, that the… | Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (Lenk, Gaziano, Lowy, Budd, Cypher, Kafker, JJ.; opinion by Budd, J.) | MassachusettsCourt | Dec. 10, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationBusiness closureGathering capStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. HI-062 | Second Amended Order Regarding Entering Judiciary Facilities, SCMF-20-0000152Second Amended Order restricting entry to judiciary facilities (travel-quarantine exclusions; face masks) (Dec. 22, 2020) | Supreme Court of Hawaii, Chief Justice Recktenwald | HawaiiCourt | Dec. 22, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-ME-012 | Opinion, Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills, No. 20-1559 (1st Cir. Jan. 14, 2021), 985 F.3d 153Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills: opinion affirming the refusal of a preliminary injunction against Maine's traveler self-quarantine… | Barron, Circuit Judge, for a panel with Selya, Circuit Judge | United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitCourt | Jan. 14, 2021 | 2021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyTravel and quarantineQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-VT-020 | State v. Club Fitness of Vermont, Inc. (Rutland Super. Ct., Civ. Div.): settlement filed January 15, 2021 (agreement to comply with the Governor's executive order; $1,000 payment)Attorney general settles with Rutland gym owner (VTDigger, Jan. 15, 2021) | State of Vermont, Attorney General T.J. Donovan; Club Fitness of Vermont, Inc. and Sean Manovill (settlement filed for court approval January 15, 2021); reported by VTDigger (Alan J. Keays), January 15, 2021 | Vermont (Rutland Superior Court, Civil Division)Court | Jan. 15, 2021 | 2021 Q1 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitStanding duty | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. DUT-NM-013 | Lujan Grisham v. Romero, 2021-NMSC-009, 483 P.3d 545, No. S-1-SC-38396 (N.M. Feb. 15, 2021)Opinion holding that the Governor and Secretary of Health are authorized to restrict or close businesses when necessary for the protection… | Supreme Court of New Mexico | New MexicoCourt | Feb. 15, 2021 | 2021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitStanding duty | Primary source read | |