The Record

The Orders Library

Name: The COVID Project Orders Library
Creator: The COVID Project

13,511 instruments indexed by The COVID Project: the orders of the fifty States and the District, forty metros, the federal layer and the agencies; the standing duties; the organizers' notices; the legal authorities. Filter by kind, State, limitation type, quarter and more; open the exhibit; download what you find.

Double quotes make a phrase ("stay at home"). An exhibit ID (TX-004) opens its record first.

The COVID Projectcovidproject.com/library

Filters:Workplace rules Other Clear all

6,090 instruments · showing 26–50

Sort Per page

Exhibit	Instrument	Issuer	Jurisdiction	Issued	Quarters	Limitations	Grade
Ex. DUT-NE-017	29 U.S.C. § 654 (2020 ed.)Duties of employers and employees (the general duty clause)	United States Congress; enforced in Nebraska by OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor	United States (Nebraska is a federal-OSHA State with no State plan)Federal	Dec. 29, 1970	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-NY-017	29 U.S.C. § 654 (duties of employers and employees; the general duty clause), 2020 editionDuties of employers and employees	Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5)	United States (applies to every private employer in New York; New York's OSHA plan covers public employers only)Federal	Dec. 29, 1970	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-SC-013	29 U.S.C. § 654 (OSH Act § 5), Duties of employers and employeesDuties of employers and employees (general duty clause)	Congress of the United States	United StatesFederal	Dec. 29, 1970	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-SD-012	29 U.S.C. § 654, Duties of employers and employees (2020 edition of the United States Code)General duty clause and duty to comply with OSHA standards	Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5), administered by OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor	United States (South Dakota is a federal-OSHA State with no State plan)Federal	Dec. 29, 1970	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-WV-031	29 U.S.C. § 654(a) (general duty clause) (cross-reference to Ex. DUT-AL-009; not re-saved)Each employer shall furnish a place of employment free from recognized hazards causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm…	Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5)	United States (applicable to West Virginia private-sector employers; West Virginia has no approved State OSHA plan for private employers)Federal	Dec. 29, 1970	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-DC-018	29 U.S.C. sec. 654 (Duties of employers and employees) (2020 ed.)Duties of employers and employees (the general duty clause)	Congress of the United States	United States (applies directly to private employers in the District of Columbia)Federal	Dec. 29, 1970	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-DE-018	29 U.S.C. § 654(a)(1) (general duty clause) and (a)(2), (b)29 U.S.C. § 654: Duties of employers and employees	United States Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5, Pub. L. 91-596)	United States (applies directly in Delaware, a federal-OSHA State with no approved State plan)Federal	Dec. 29, 1970	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-FED-008	29 C.F.R. part 1977 (discrimination against employees exercising rights under the OSH Act), § 1977.12(b)(2)Discrimination Against Employees Exercising Rights Under the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970	Occupational Safety and Health Administration (interpretive regulations under OSH Act § 11(c))	United StatesFederal	Jan. 16, 1973	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-OH-007	Statute (version effective January 1, 1974, Am. Sub. H.B. 511, 109th G.A.; in force through April 5, 2023)Exposing others to contagion	General Assembly of Ohio (Ohio Revised Code, Chapter 3701)	OhioState	Jan. 1, 1974	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolationStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-FED-003	29 C.F.R. 1910.132 (personal protective equipment, general requirements)General requirements (Subpart I, Personal Protective Equipment)	Occupational Safety and Health Administration (standard promulgated under 29 U.S.C. 655)	United StatesFederal	June 27, 1974	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-FED-005	29 C.F.R. 1910.141 (sanitation)Sanitation (Subpart J)	Occupational Safety and Health Administration	United StatesFederal	June 27, 1974	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-NJ-004	N.J.S.A. 26:1A-9, Force and effect of Code; enforcement; local regulationsForce and effect of Code; enforcement; local regulations	New Jersey Legislature (L.1947, c. 177, s. 9; amended L.1974, c. 150)	New JerseyState	Nov. 11, 1974	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyStanding dutyOther	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-KY-006	902 KAR 2:050Control procedures; application	Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Public Health (regulation of the former Cabinet for Human Resources)	KentuckyState	Dec. 11, 1974	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyBusiness closureWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolationStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-MI-013	MCL 408.1011, Duties of employer (MIOSHA Act sec. 11)MIOSHA Act sec. 11: the general duty to furnish a place of employment free from recognized hazards and to comply with MIOSHA rules…	Michigan Legislature (Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1974 PA 154)	MichiganState	Jan. 1, 1975	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-MI-014	MCL 408.1035, Civil and criminal penalties (MIOSHA Act sec. 35)MIOSHA Act sec. 35: civil penalties for serious, failure-to-abate, willful and repeated violations; felony for a willful violation causing…	Michigan Legislature (Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1974 PA 154)	MichiganState	Jan. 1, 1975	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-SC-008	S.C. Code Regs. Chapter 71, Article 1 (Occupational Safety and Health): Reg. 71-108 (Incorporation by Reference), Reg. 71-112 (General Duty Clause), Subarticle 6 (South Carolina Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry)Occupational Safety and Health regulations: general duty clause; incorporation by reference of federal standards; general industry standards…	South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Office of Occupational Safety and Health (SC OSHA), by regulation under § 41-15-210	South CarolinaState	Jan. 1, 1975	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. LAW-326	Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (1976)Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (1976)	Supreme Court of the United States	United States or State (legal authority; see citation)Legal authority	June 17, 1976	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Legal authorityOther	Primary source read
Ex. LAW-323	Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977)Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977)	Supreme Court of the United States	United States or State (legal authority; see citation)Legal authority	Jan. 11, 1977	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Legal authorityOther	Primary source read
Ex. LAW-320	Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978)Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978)	Supreme Court of the United States	United States or State (legal authority; see citation)Legal authority	May 15, 1978	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Legal authorityOther	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-OK-009	11 O.S. 22-120 (with 22-121), in the Legislature's complete Title 11 (page 182 of the exhibit)Public health, hospitals, quarantine, and environmental hazards; Nuisances	Oklahoma Legislature (Oklahoma Municipal Code, Title 11)	OklahomaState	July 1, 1978	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyCapacity limitFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolationStanding duty	Primary source read
Ex. LAW-322	Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 440 U.S. 391 (1979)Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 440 U.S. 391 (1979)	Supreme Court of the United States	United States or State (legal authority; see citation)Legal authority	Mar. 5, 1979	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Legal authorityOther	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-DC-003	D.C. Official Code sec. 7-2307Violation of emergency executive order	Council of the District of Columbia	District of ColumbiaState	Mar. 5, 1981	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyStanding dutyOther	Primary source read
Ex. LAW-318	Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130 (1982)Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130 (1982)	Supreme Court of the United States	United States or State (legal authority; see citation)Legal authority	Jan. 25, 1982	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Legal authorityOther	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-OR-019	Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and 'may' be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review	Supreme Court of Oregon	OregonCourt	Feb. 12, 1985	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyStanding dutyOther	Primary source read
Ex. DUT-OH-017	Court decisionEicher v. United States Steel Corp., 32 Ohio St.3d 248 (1987) (decided September 2, 1987)	Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793)	OhioCourt	Sept. 2, 1987	2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3	Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty	Primary source read

United States Congress; enforced in Nebraska by OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 29 U.S.C. § 654 (2020 ed.) (standing) (Ex. DUT-NE-017)
Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5), 29 U.S.C. § 654 (duties of employers and employees; the general duty clause), 2020 edition (standing) (Ex. DUT-NY-017)
Congress of the United States, 29 U.S.C. § 654 (OSH Act § 5), Duties of employers and employees (standing) (Ex. DUT-SC-013)
Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5), administered by OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 29 U.S.C. § 654, Duties of employers and employees (2020 edition of the United States Code) (standing) (Ex. DUT-SD-012)
Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5), 29 U.S.C. § 654(a) (general duty clause) (cross-reference to Ex. DUT-AL-009; not re-saved) (standing) (Ex. DUT-WV-031)
Congress of the United States, 29 U.S.C. sec. 654 (Duties of employers and employees) (2020 ed.) (standing) (Ex. DUT-DC-018)
United States Congress (Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, § 5, Pub. L. 91-596), 29 U.S.C. § 654(a)(1) (general duty clause) and (a)(2), (b) (standing) (Ex. DUT-DE-018)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (interpretive regulations under OSH Act § 11(c)), 29 C.F.R. part 1977 (discrimination against employees exercising rights under the OSH Act), § 1977.12(b)(2) (standing) (Ex. DUT-FED-008)
General Assembly of Ohio (Ohio Revised Code, Chapter 3701), Statute (version effective January 1, 1974, Am. Sub. H.B. 511, 109th G.A.; in force through April 5, 2023) (standing) (Ex. DUT-OH-007)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (standard promulgated under 29 U.S.C. 655), 29 C.F.R. 1910.132 (personal protective equipment, general requirements) (standing) (Ex. DUT-FED-003)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 C.F.R. 1910.141 (sanitation) (standing) (Ex. DUT-FED-005)
New Jersey Legislature (L.1947, c. 177, s. 9; amended L.1974, c. 150), N.J.S.A. 26:1A-9, Force and effect of Code; enforcement; local regulations (standing) (Ex. DUT-NJ-004)
Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Public Health (regulation of the former Cabinet for Human Resources), 902 KAR 2:050 (standing) (Ex. DUT-KY-006)
Michigan Legislature (Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1974 PA 154), MCL 408.1011, Duties of employer (MIOSHA Act sec. 11) (standing) (Ex. DUT-MI-013)
Michigan Legislature (Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1974 PA 154), MCL 408.1035, Civil and criminal penalties (MIOSHA Act sec. 35) (standing) (Ex. DUT-MI-014)
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Office of Occupational Safety and Health (SC OSHA), by regulation under § 41-15-210, S.C. Code Regs. Chapter 71, Article 1 (Occupational Safety and Health): Reg. 71-108 (Incorporation by Reference), Reg. 71-112 (General Duty Clause), Subarticle 6 (South Carolina Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry) (standing) (Ex. DUT-SC-008)
Supreme Court of the United States, Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (1976) (June 17, 1976) (Ex. LAW-326)
Supreme Court of the United States, Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977) (Jan. 11, 1977) (Ex. LAW-323)
Supreme Court of the United States, Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) (May 15, 1978) (Ex. LAW-320)
Oklahoma Legislature (Oklahoma Municipal Code, Title 11), 11 O.S. 22-120 (with 22-121), in the Legislature's complete Title 11 (page 182 of the exhibit) (standing) (Ex. DUT-OK-009)
Supreme Court of the United States, Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 440 U.S. 391 (1979) (Mar. 5, 1979) (Ex. LAW-322)
Council of the District of Columbia, D.C. Official Code sec. 7-2307 (standing) (Ex. DUT-DC-003)
Supreme Court of the United States, Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130 (1982) (Jan. 25, 1982) (Ex. LAW-318)
Supreme Court of Oregon, Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and 'may' be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care) (standing) (Ex. DUT-OR-019)
Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793), Court decision (standing) (Ex. DUT-OH-017)

The Orders Library

Results